<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1080 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194978</link>
    <description>The case involved the allowability of deduction under section 35(1) of the Income-tax Act for product development expenditure related to scientific research. The Assessing Officer disallowed the expenditure as capital, but the CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessee, stating the expenditure was revenue expenditure and allowable under section 35(1)(i). The Revenue appealed, arguing the expenditure was capital and for commercial production, not scientific research. The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue, holding the expenditure was for setting up facilities for commercial production, not scientific research, and should be treated as capital expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 18:46:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1080 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194978</link>
      <description>The case involved the allowability of deduction under section 35(1) of the Income-tax Act for product development expenditure related to scientific research. The Assessing Officer disallowed the expenditure as capital, but the CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessee, stating the expenditure was revenue expenditure and allowable under section 35(1)(i). The Revenue appealed, arguing the expenditure was capital and for commercial production, not scientific research. The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue, holding the expenditure was for setting up facilities for commercial production, not scientific research, and should be treated as capital expenditure. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>