https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194971 An application for additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC must be considered together with the appeal on merits, because its allowance depends on whether the evidence enables a more satisfactory judgment or is required in the interests of justice. Rejection of such an application before hearing the appeal was held to be inappropriate, and the refusal order was found unsustainable. The order was set aside, and the matter was restored for fresh consideration of the appeal and the application in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Oct 2017 15:40:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194971 An application for additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC must be considered together with the appeal on merits, because its allowance depends on whether the evidence enables a more satisfactory judgment or is required in the interests of justice. Rejection of such an application before hearing the appeal was held to be inappropriate, and the refusal order was found unsustainable. The order was set aside, and the matter was restored for fresh consideration of the appeal and the application in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194971