<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 25 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10174</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the interest income credited to the minor&#039;s account did not have a direct or indirect nexus with the minor&#039;s admission to the partnership firm. Therefore, the court concluded that the interest amount was not includible in the total income of the assessee under section 64(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 25 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10174</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that the interest income credited to the minor&#039;s account did not have a direct or indirect nexus with the minor&#039;s admission to the partnership firm. Therefore, the court concluded that the interest amount was not includible in the total income of the assessee under section 64(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>