https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194970 A petition alleging oppression and mismanagement could not be referred to arbitration where the pleadings were not wholly covered by the shareholders' agreement. Allegations of misuse of majority power, oppression, mismanagement, and violations arising from the articles of association and statutory rights had to be examined under the Companies Act and the articles, not split between forum and arbitration. Section 8 applied only when the entire dispute fell within the arbitration agreement. The arbitration clause therefore did not oust the Board's jurisdiction, and the Section 8 application was dismissed while the petition was retained for adjudication. en-us Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Oct 2017 14:56:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194970 A petition alleging oppression and mismanagement could not be referred to arbitration where the pleadings were not wholly covered by the shareholders' agreement. Allegations of misuse of majority power, oppression, mismanagement, and violations arising from the articles of association and statutory rights had to be examined under the Companies Act and the articles, not split between forum and arbitration. Section 8 applied only when the entire dispute fell within the arbitration agreement. The arbitration clause therefore did not oust the Board's jurisdiction, and the Section 8 application was dismissed while the petition was retained for adjudication. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194970