https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349211 Anti-dumping duty could not be levied for the interregnum between expiry of a provisional notification and the later final notification made effective from an earlier date. The legal position was treated as settled by binding Supreme Court authority on the same issue, under which such retroactive levy for the gap period was not sustainable. On that basis, the demand for duty covering the interregnum was held to be unsustainable in law. en-us Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Oct 2017 11:26:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349211 Anti-dumping duty could not be levied for the interregnum between expiry of a provisional notification and the later final notification made effective from an earlier date. The legal position was treated as settled by binding Supreme Court authority on the same issue, under which such retroactive levy for the gap period was not sustainable. On that basis, the demand for duty covering the interregnum was held to be unsustainable in law. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349211