<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 347 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision confirming a demand for service tax liability on service charges collected by a Bank, remanding the matter for reconsideration. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to determine if charges related to money changing activities were subject to service tax and to reassess penalties imposed under Section 76 and Section 78. The appeal was allowed for further review based on specific terms provided for reevaluation and decision-making.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 11:24:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 347 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision confirming a demand for service tax liability on service charges collected by a Bank, remanding the matter for reconsideration. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to determine if charges related to money changing activities were subject to service tax and to reassess penalties imposed under Section 76 and Section 78. The appeal was allowed for further review based on specific terms provided for reevaluation and decision-making.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>