<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 41 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10165</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, considering the nursing home building as a &quot;plant&quot; eligible for extra shift allowance. The court emphasized the need for specific evidence to determine which parts of a building qualify as a plant for depreciation purposes. The High Court remanded the matter for further consideration to determine which areas of the nursing home qualify as a plant, highlighting the importance of factual evidence in making such determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 41 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10165</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, considering the nursing home building as a &quot;plant&quot; eligible for extra shift allowance. The court emphasized the need for specific evidence to determine which parts of a building qualify as a plant for depreciation purposes. The High Court remanded the matter for further consideration to determine which areas of the nursing home qualify as a plant, highlighting the importance of factual evidence in making such determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>