<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (10) TMI 69 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194952</link>
    <description>The Corporation retained statutory power to appoint officers and servants and to fix interim service conditions even before regulations were framed, because the Act did not make prior regulations or State directions a condition precedent to functioning. The General Manager, acting under general management powers, was competent to issue the recruitment notice without a separate specific resolution. The challenge to the notice therefore failed, and no vested right to promotion was established on the respondent&#039;s facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (10) TMI 69 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194952</link>
      <description>The Corporation retained statutory power to appoint officers and servants and to fix interim service conditions even before regulations were framed, because the Act did not make prior regulations or State directions a condition precedent to functioning. The General Manager, acting under general management powers, was competent to issue the recruitment notice without a separate specific resolution. The challenge to the notice therefore failed, and no vested right to promotion was established on the respondent&#039;s facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>