<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 725 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194947</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the HC&#039;s judgment that Ramayee Ammal was the absolute owner of the property, not holding it as benami for Malaya Gounder. The plaintiff failed to prove the benami nature of the transaction or the source of the purchase money. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 725 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194947</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, affirming the HC&#039;s judgment that Ramayee Ammal was the absolute owner of the property, not holding it as benami for Malaya Gounder. The plaintiff failed to prove the benami nature of the transaction or the source of the purchase money. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>