<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1280 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194936</link>
    <description>The judgment modifies the impugned order, allowing redemption of confiscated goods and reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant. The decision emphasizes the correct interpretation of the option to redeem and considers the appellant&#039;s role as a carrier in the incident.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1280 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194936</link>
      <description>The judgment modifies the impugned order, allowing redemption of confiscated goods and reducing the penalty imposed on the appellant. The decision emphasizes the correct interpretation of the option to redeem and considers the appellant&#039;s role as a carrier in the incident.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>