<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1124 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194940</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant relief on certain expenses for Fringe Benefit Tax, allowing claims not previously made before the Assessing Officer. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s contention, stating the claim was not new and could be raised in appeal. Additionally, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on expenses incurred for non-employees and gifts to non-employees, finding no reason to dispute the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Court also supported the Tribunal&#039;s classification of certain expenses as capital expenditure, based on a CBDT Circular. Other questions were admitted for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2017 11:37:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1124 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194940</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant relief on certain expenses for Fringe Benefit Tax, allowing claims not previously made before the Assessing Officer. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s contention, stating the claim was not new and could be raised in appeal. Additionally, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on expenses incurred for non-employees and gifts to non-employees, finding no reason to dispute the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Court also supported the Tribunal&#039;s classification of certain expenses as capital expenditure, based on a CBDT Circular. Other questions were admitted for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>