<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 317 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349162</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing deductions claimed by the assessee under Sections 80P(2)(e), 80P(2)(d), and 80P(2)(a)(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the assessee met the conditions for these deductions, and the CIT(A) correctly allowed them, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:00:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 317 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349162</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing deductions claimed by the assessee under Sections 80P(2)(e), 80P(2)(d), and 80P(2)(a)(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the assessee met the conditions for these deductions, and the CIT(A) correctly allowed them, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>