https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349151 The Madras HC upheld the Tribunal's refusal to recall its earlier order and restore the appeal because no sufficient cause was shown for the appellant's non-appearance. The explanation that counsel was occupied in another matter was found inadequate, especially given the repeated adjournments and the prolonged conduct of the customs dispute since 1992. In proceedings concerning the attempted export of sandalwood chips on the basis of allegedly fabricated documents, the Court held that the appellant had not justified interference with the Tribunal's decision to decline recall. en-us Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Oct 2017 08:59:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349151 The Madras HC upheld the Tribunal's refusal to recall its earlier order and restore the appeal because no sufficient cause was shown for the appellant's non-appearance. The explanation that counsel was occupied in another matter was found inadequate, especially given the repeated adjournments and the prolonged conduct of the customs dispute since 1992. In proceedings concerning the attempted export of sandalwood chips on the basis of allegedly fabricated documents, the Court held that the appellant had not justified interference with the Tribunal's decision to decline recall. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349151