<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 29 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10152</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the Tribunal was not justified in confirming the penalty without addressing the grounds of appeal related to immunity under the amnesty scheme. The Court emphasized the importance of appellate authorities thoroughly examining all grounds raised by appellants. The judgment serves as a reminder of the legal obligations of such authorities to consider all grounds before making decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 29 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10152</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the Tribunal was not justified in confirming the penalty without addressing the grounds of appeal related to immunity under the amnesty scheme. The Court emphasized the importance of appellate authorities thoroughly examining all grounds raised by appellants. The judgment serves as a reminder of the legal obligations of such authorities to consider all grounds before making decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>