<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 276 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349121</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed that transactions between the appellant and manufacturers constituted sales, applying Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for valuation. Emphasizing the importance of physical and ownership transfers in defining a sale, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2017 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 276 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349121</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed that transactions between the appellant and manufacturers constituted sales, applying Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for valuation. Emphasizing the importance of physical and ownership transfers in defining a sale, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>