<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 275 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349120</link>
    <description>Notification No. 23/98-CE treated paper as exempt newsprint where it was intended for printing newspapers, manufactured by a mill specified under the Newsprint Control Order, 1962, and supplied against a purchase order from a newspaper registered under the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867. The record showed that the supplier was a notified newsprint mill and the buyers held newspaper registration certificates. The notification did not require proof of actual use in printing newspapers, and a broader end-use condition could not be imported from other enactments. On that construction, the supply qualified as newsprint and excise duty was not payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 275 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349120</link>
      <description>Notification No. 23/98-CE treated paper as exempt newsprint where it was intended for printing newspapers, manufactured by a mill specified under the Newsprint Control Order, 1962, and supplied against a purchase order from a newspaper registered under the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867. The record showed that the supplier was a notified newsprint mill and the buyers held newspaper registration certificates. The notification did not require proof of actual use in printing newspapers, and a broader end-use condition could not be imported from other enactments. On that construction, the supply qualified as newsprint and excise duty was not payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>