https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349119 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration of the demand of ineligible CENVAT credit, denial of CENVAT credit on sub-contractor invoices, and confusion regarding CENVAT credit, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice. The denial of CENVAT credit on service tax paid on penal charges was set aside based on established legal precedents in favor of the appellant. The matter was sent back for fresh consideration with all issues open, without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. en-us Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Oct 2017 08:56:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349119 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration of the demand of ineligible CENVAT credit, denial of CENVAT credit on sub-contractor invoices, and confusion regarding CENVAT credit, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice. The denial of CENVAT credit on service tax paid on penal charges was set aside based on established legal precedents in favor of the appellant. The matter was sent back for fresh consideration with all issues open, without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349119