<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 270 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349115</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on MS angles, HR plates and HR coils used to fabricate support structures for capital goods was considered under the user test in Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The stated principle is that such structural steel items may qualify as components, spares or accessories of capital goods where they support and enable machinery function, but the claim must be proved by evidence of actual use. As the record lacked sufficient supporting material, including a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate, factual verification was required and the matter was remanded for fresh decision with liberty to adduce evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2017 08:56:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 270 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349115</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on MS angles, HR plates and HR coils used to fabricate support structures for capital goods was considered under the user test in Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The stated principle is that such structural steel items may qualify as components, spares or accessories of capital goods where they support and enable machinery function, but the claim must be proved by evidence of actual use. As the record lacked sufficient supporting material, including a Chartered Engineer&#039;s certificate, factual verification was required and the matter was remanded for fresh decision with liberty to adduce evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>