<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 259 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349104</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a reassessment order was held not maintainable because the statute provided an effective appellate remedy before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals). The Court found that the initial notice had specifically called for objections to the proposed disallowance of input tax credit and estimation of purchases, but no specific objections were filed before the assessing authority. On that record, the plea of denial of natural justice was rejected. The appellate authority was noted to have co-extensive powers to examine the factual objections and the assessment record, so the assessee was left to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2017 08:55:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 259 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349104</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a reassessment order was held not maintainable because the statute provided an effective appellate remedy before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals). The Court found that the initial notice had specifically called for objections to the proposed disallowance of input tax credit and estimation of purchases, but no specific objections were filed before the assessing authority. On that record, the plea of denial of natural justice was rejected. The appellate authority was noted to have co-extensive powers to examine the factual objections and the assessment record, so the assessee was left to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>