<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1188 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194930</link>
    <description>In a cheque dishonour matter arising from stop payment instructions, the Supreme Court noted that the statutory framework governing negotiable instruments applied, but found no sufficient ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s refusal to recall its order quashing the complaint and consequential proceedings. The complainant had declined the offer to pay the cheque amount with added interest and compensation, while the appellant failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance when the complaint was quashed. The challenge to the refusal to recall was also highly delayed, so the order declining recall was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1188 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194930</link>
      <description>In a cheque dishonour matter arising from stop payment instructions, the Supreme Court noted that the statutory framework governing negotiable instruments applied, but found no sufficient ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s refusal to recall its order quashing the complaint and consequential proceedings. The complainant had declined the offer to pay the cheque amount with added interest and compensation, while the appellant failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance when the complaint was quashed. The challenge to the refusal to recall was also highly delayed, so the order declining recall was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>