<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CCI issues order against Grasim Industries Limited, Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Ltd. and Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. for bid rigging Delhi Jal Board tenders for supply of Poly Aluminium Chloride;Imposes penalty of 2.30 crore, 2.09 crore and 1.88 crore upon GIL, ABCIL and GACL for the anti-competitive conduct</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=18871</link>
    <description>The Commission found Grasim Industries, Aditya Birla Chemicals and Gujarat Alkalies guilty of bid rigging under Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(d) for Delhi Jal Board PAC tenders, rejected the single economic entity plea for Grasim and Aditya Birla, described coordinated bidding through common channels as a fac ade of competition, issued cease-and-desist directions and imposed penalties based on percentages of average relevant turnover; a separate Liquid Chlorine reference found no contravention due to insufficient Director General analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 14:01:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 14:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CCI issues order against Grasim Industries Limited, Aditya Birla Chemicals (India) Ltd. and Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd. for bid rigging Delhi Jal Board tenders for supply of Poly Aluminium Chloride;Imposes penalty of 2.30 crore, 2.09 crore and 1.88 crore upon GIL, ABCIL and GACL for the anti-competitive conduct</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=18871</link>
      <description>The Commission found Grasim Industries, Aditya Birla Chemicals and Gujarat Alkalies guilty of bid rigging under Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(d) for Delhi Jal Board PAC tenders, rejected the single economic entity plea for Grasim and Aditya Birla, described coordinated bidding through common channels as a fac ade of competition, issued cease-and-desist directions and imposed penalties based on percentages of average relevant turnover; a separate Liquid Chlorine reference found no contravention due to insufficient Director General analysis.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 14:01:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=18871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>