<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 233 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349078</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to re-examine the disallowance of foreign travel expenses and the allocation of Head Office (HO) expenses. The AO was instructed to consider the argument for net HO expenditure allocation and to allow the assessee to present additional evidence to establish the business purpose of the expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 06:53:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 233 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349078</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to re-examine the disallowance of foreign travel expenses and the allocation of Head Office (HO) expenses. The AO was instructed to consider the argument for net HO expenditure allocation and to allow the assessee to present additional evidence to establish the business purpose of the expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>