https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349066 The Tribunal allowed the appeals concerning the correct quantification of imported Crude Palm Oil in bulk, ruling in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the quantities recorded by the appellants and those assessed by Customs, but emphasized the lack of evidence supporting allegations of diversion or clandestine removal. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the alleged short quantities negligible (less than 1% of total imported quantity), leading to the rejection of the demand for differential duty and penalties. The appeals were allowed, emphasizing the importance of proper measurement procedures and the necessity of evidence to support allegations of non-compliance. en-us Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Oct 2017 06:52:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349066 The Tribunal allowed the appeals concerning the correct quantification of imported Crude Palm Oil in bulk, ruling in favor of the appellants. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the quantities recorded by the appellants and those assessed by Customs, but emphasized the lack of evidence supporting allegations of diversion or clandestine removal. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the alleged short quantities negligible (less than 1% of total imported quantity), leading to the rejection of the demand for differential duty and penalties. The appeals were allowed, emphasizing the importance of proper measurement procedures and the necessity of evidence to support allegations of non-compliance. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349066