<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 205 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner due to a violation of natural justice in the imposition of penalties and interest under Sections 11AB and 11AC. The penalties and interest were set aside as these sections were found to be inapplicable during the relevant period of the alleged offense. The appeal was allowed for further proceedings to address the duty demand issues in compliance with legal provisions and principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2017 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 205 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner due to a violation of natural justice in the imposition of penalties and interest under Sections 11AB and 11AC. The penalties and interest were set aside as these sections were found to be inapplicable during the relevant period of the alleged offense. The appeal was allowed for further proceedings to address the duty demand issues in compliance with legal provisions and principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>