<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10136</link>
    <description>Under the Estate Duty Act, unpaid instalments under a hire purchase arrangement for a house claimed as exempt residential property were not separately deductible as a debt from the estate. The deceased was treated as only a tenant until all instalments were paid and a conveyance executed, so the property was not fully owned for exemption purposes; however, the unpaid instalments were still a liability of the deceased. Because section 44 permits deduction only of debts and incumbrances from the value of the property liable thereto, and the house had already been valued at the full agreed price, the claimed separate deduction was disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 38 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10136</link>
      <description>Under the Estate Duty Act, unpaid instalments under a hire purchase arrangement for a house claimed as exempt residential property were not separately deductible as a debt from the estate. The deceased was treated as only a tenant until all instalments were paid and a conveyance executed, so the property was not fully owned for exemption purposes; however, the unpaid instalments were still a liability of the deceased. Because section 44 permits deduction only of debts and incumbrances from the value of the property liable thereto, and the house had already been valued at the full agreed price, the claimed separate deduction was disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>