<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 196 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349041</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the denial of CENVAT credit on central excise duty for TMT bars and service tax for gardening and maintenance services. The tribunal found the appellant eligible for the credit based on precedents and set aside the order-in-original, declaring it unsustainable. The impugned order was overturned, and the appellant succeeded in obtaining the CENVAT credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 06:50:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 196 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349041</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning the denial of CENVAT credit on central excise duty for TMT bars and service tax for gardening and maintenance services. The tribunal found the appellant eligible for the credit based on precedents and set aside the order-in-original, declaring it unsustainable. The impugned order was overturned, and the appellant succeeded in obtaining the CENVAT credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>