https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349039 Cenvat credit on insurance premium for vehicles used in dispatch and movement of goods was held inadmissible for the period after 01.04.2011 because the amended input service definition excluded such claims, so denial of credit with interest was sustained. Cenvat credit on CHA services was also denied because the invoice was not in the appellant's name and no other evidence showed receipt of the service, so the demand with interest was upheld. Penalties were nevertheless set aside because prior credit allowed in the assessee's own case supported a bona fide belief, resulting in partial relief. en-us Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Oct 2017 12:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349039 Cenvat credit on insurance premium for vehicles used in dispatch and movement of goods was held inadmissible for the period after 01.04.2011 because the amended input service definition excluded such claims, so denial of credit with interest was sustained. Cenvat credit on CHA services was also denied because the invoice was not in the appellant's name and no other evidence showed receipt of the service, so the demand with interest was upheld. Penalties were nevertheless set aside because prior credit allowed in the assessee's own case supported a bona fide belief, resulting in partial relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349039