<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 191 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349036</link>
    <description>Inter-unit clearances within the same company, made without sale, are valued under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules at 110% of the CAS-4 determined value. Prices charged to independent buyers cannot replace that prescribed valuation where duty has been paid on the Rule 8 basis. The analysis also identifies revenue neutrality because duty paid by the sending unit is available as credit to the receiving unit. Consequently, a differential-duty demand based on independent-buyer prices is unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 191 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349036</link>
      <description>Inter-unit clearances within the same company, made without sale, are valued under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules at 110% of the CAS-4 determined value. Prices charged to independent buyers cannot replace that prescribed valuation where duty has been paid on the Rule 8 basis. The analysis also identifies revenue neutrality because duty paid by the sending unit is available as credit to the receiving unit. Consequently, a differential-duty demand based on independent-buyer prices is unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>