<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 187 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349032</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Classic Stripes Pvt Ltd regarding the availment of CENVAT credit on goods returned and subsequently scrapped. It was held that the denial of CENVAT credit was unwarranted as the scrapping was duly recorded, and proper documentation was maintained, meeting legal requirements. The Tribunal emphasized that scrapping during the manufacturing process should not hinder CENVAT credit availment, setting aside the impugned order and highlighting the importance of a legal basis in such decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 187 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349032</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Classic Stripes Pvt Ltd regarding the availment of CENVAT credit on goods returned and subsequently scrapped. It was held that the denial of CENVAT credit was unwarranted as the scrapping was duly recorded, and proper documentation was maintained, meeting legal requirements. The Tribunal emphasized that scrapping during the manufacturing process should not hinder CENVAT credit availment, setting aside the impugned order and highlighting the importance of a legal basis in such decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>