<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 186 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the Service Tax paid on &#039;Courier Services&#039; for sending samples, documents, and finished goods, even after the amendment to the definition of &#039;Input Services,&#039; is admissible for CENVAT credit. Similarly, the Service Tax paid on CHA and C&amp;amp;F Services was deemed eligible for credit. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the appellants, allowing their appeals and providing relief accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 06:49:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 186 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the Service Tax paid on &#039;Courier Services&#039; for sending samples, documents, and finished goods, even after the amendment to the definition of &#039;Input Services,&#039; is admissible for CENVAT credit. Similarly, the Service Tax paid on CHA and C&amp;amp;F Services was deemed eligible for credit. The Tribunal&#039;s decision favored the appellants, allowing their appeals and providing relief accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>