<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 181 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349026</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Additional Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to issue a show-cause notice under Clause 8 of the Amnesty Scheme. Despite the expiration of the limitation period, the court allowed the Revenue to issue a fresh notice due to the Assessee&#039;s delayed challenge on the jurisdictional issue. The High Court&#039;s decision was set aside, and the Revenue was granted the opportunity to proceed with a new notice if deemed necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 181 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349026</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Additional Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to issue a show-cause notice under Clause 8 of the Amnesty Scheme. Despite the expiration of the limitation period, the court allowed the Revenue to issue a fresh notice due to the Assessee&#039;s delayed challenge on the jurisdictional issue. The High Court&#039;s decision was set aside, and the Revenue was granted the opportunity to proceed with a new notice if deemed necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>