<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 718 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194908</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, ruling that the respondents engaged in oppressive and mismanaged conduct. The judgment included the cancellation of illegal share allotments, restoration of equal shareholding, equal Board representation, and the return of siphoned funds. Additionally, the petitioner was granted access to company records and participation in its affairs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 17:02:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 718 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194908</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, ruling that the respondents engaged in oppressive and mismanaged conduct. The judgment included the cancellation of illegal share allotments, restoration of equal shareholding, equal Board representation, and the return of siphoned funds. Additionally, the petitioner was granted access to company records and participation in its affairs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>