https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194906 An amendment to a plaint under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was found permissible where it only reduced the extent of the same suit property and corrected its boundaries and measurements. The court held that the proposed change did not substitute a different property, alter the source of title, or introduce a new cause of action; the suit remained one for declaration of title and permanent injunction. Delay alone was not enough to refuse amendment in the absence of unavoidable prejudice. The refusal to amend was therefore set aside, and the amendment was treated as bona fide. en-us Thu, 31 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Oct 2017 16:45:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194906 An amendment to a plaint under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was found permissible where it only reduced the extent of the same suit property and corrected its boundaries and measurements. The court held that the proposed change did not substitute a different property, alter the source of title, or introduce a new cause of action; the suit remained one for declaration of title and permanent injunction. Delay alone was not enough to refuse amendment in the absence of unavoidable prejudice. The refusal to amend was therefore set aside, and the amendment was treated as bona fide. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194906