https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194904 The High Court held that it does not have the jurisdiction to set aside a punishment imposed by a disciplinary authority, even if it deems the punishment arbitrary or excessive, when the punishment follows a full-fledged enquiry. The Court clarified that it cannot substitute punishments, as the power to do so lies with the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution. The judgment emphasized that the High Court's power is limited in such matters and that the Supreme Court has the authority to pass orders for "complete justice" under Article 142 of the Constitution. en-us Thu, 23 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:05:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194904 The High Court held that it does not have the jurisdiction to set aside a punishment imposed by a disciplinary authority, even if it deems the punishment arbitrary or excessive, when the punishment follows a full-fledged enquiry. The Court clarified that it cannot substitute punishments, as the power to do so lies with the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution. The judgment emphasized that the High Court's power is limited in such matters and that the Supreme Court has the authority to pass orders for "complete justice" under Article 142 of the Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194904