<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1056 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194903</link>
    <description>The second proviso to Section 15(1) of SICA is to be read purposively and harmoniously with the third proviso and the SARFAESI framework. On that construction, a reference under SICA is not defeated by any trivial acquisition of secured financial assets by an asset reconstruction company or securitisation company. The operative threshold is 75% of the secured assets, and only acquisition at that level attracts the proviso. A literal reading allowing a minimal acquisition to trigger the provision was rejected as inconsistent with the scheme of revival and rehabilitation and as producing an absurd result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:02:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1056 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194903</link>
      <description>The second proviso to Section 15(1) of SICA is to be read purposively and harmoniously with the third proviso and the SARFAESI framework. On that construction, a reference under SICA is not defeated by any trivial acquisition of secured financial assets by an asset reconstruction company or securitisation company. The operative threshold is 75% of the secured assets, and only acquisition at that level attracts the proviso. A literal reading allowing a minimal acquisition to trigger the provision was rejected as inconsistent with the scheme of revival and rehabilitation and as producing an absurd result.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>