<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 20 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10128</link>
    <description>The court found the search and seizure of the partnership firm&#039;s books of account to be illegal and unauthorized. It held that the Revenue lacked jurisdiction to retain the seized materials indefinitely. The court directed the return of the seized materials to the petitioner within 15 days and ordered the Revenue to pay the costs of the application. The request for a stay of the judgment and order was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 20 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10128</link>
      <description>The court found the search and seizure of the partnership firm&#039;s books of account to be illegal and unauthorized. It held that the Revenue lacked jurisdiction to retain the seized materials indefinitely. The court directed the return of the seized materials to the petitioner within 15 days and ordered the Revenue to pay the costs of the application. The request for a stay of the judgment and order was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>