<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1147 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194899</link>
    <description>Excess tariff amounts collected by a generating company during the interim period before final tariff determination were held not to attract interest under Section 62(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003, because that provision applies to recovery beyond the tariff finally determined under the statutory process and does not create a separate right to interest. Interest also could not be awarded on equitable or restitutory grounds, as the prevailing tariff regime contained no express right to such relief and the later regulatory amendment could not operate retrospectively. The tariff differential remained adjustable, but no interest was payable for the intervening period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1147 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194899</link>
      <description>Excess tariff amounts collected by a generating company during the interim period before final tariff determination were held not to attract interest under Section 62(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003, because that provision applies to recovery beyond the tariff finally determined under the statutory process and does not create a separate right to interest. Interest also could not be awarded on equitable or restitutory grounds, as the prevailing tariff regime contained no express right to such relief and the later regulatory amendment could not operate retrospectively. The tariff differential remained adjustable, but no interest was payable for the intervening period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>