<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 176 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349021</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision to delete additions under section 14A read with Rule 8D. It was held that the investments were for business purposes, not for earning dividends, and disallowances were unjustified. The Tribunal also rejected the disallowance of expenses for managing investments and upheld the disallowance of cash purchases under Rule 6DD(f) due to lack of verifiable details.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:45:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 176 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349021</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision to delete additions under section 14A read with Rule 8D. It was held that the investments were for business purposes, not for earning dividends, and disallowances were unjustified. The Tribunal also rejected the disallowance of expenses for managing investments and upheld the disallowance of cash purchases under Rule 6DD(f) due to lack of verifiable details.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>