<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 175 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349020</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 2,14,549/- for delayed PF and ESI contributions. Following the Delhi HC&#039;s precedent, it held that such delayed payments, made before the return filing due date, should not be treated as income. The Tribunal found the jurisdictional HC&#039;s decision binding, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 175 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349020</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 2,14,549/- for delayed PF and ESI contributions. Following the Delhi HC&#039;s precedent, it held that such delayed payments, made before the return filing due date, should not be treated as income. The Tribunal found the jurisdictional HC&#039;s decision binding, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>