<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 167 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349012</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that as the assessments were not abated and no incriminating material was found during the search, the additions made by the Assessing Officer were not sustainable. The appeals were partly allowed, and the Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the additions/disallowances. The legal issue was decided in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that additions should be based on incriminating material found during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 167 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349012</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that as the assessments were not abated and no incriminating material was found during the search, the additions made by the Assessing Officer were not sustainable. The appeals were partly allowed, and the Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the additions/disallowances. The legal issue was decided in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that additions should be based on incriminating material found during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>