<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 161 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349006</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed all three appeals of the Revenue. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to sufficient cause found. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the allowability of depreciation on temporary structures and expenditure on interior decoration, citing relevant judgments. Consequently, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was also dismissed as the tribunal confirmed the deletion of the addition made by the Ld.CIT(A) on this issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:44:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 161 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349006</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed all three appeals of the Revenue. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to sufficient cause found. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the allowability of depreciation on temporary structures and expenditure on interior decoration, citing relevant judgments. Consequently, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was also dismissed as the tribunal confirmed the deletion of the addition made by the Ld.CIT(A) on this issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>