<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 158 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349003</link>
    <description>The Tribunal disposed of the appeals related to refund claims by M/s.MMTC for exports during June 2008 to November 2008. The original authority and Commissioner (Appeals) had rejected the claims, leading to appeals by MMTC and Department. MMTC&#039;s advocate presented detailed arguments, including the acceptance of Indemnity Bonds for rejected claims. The Tribunal ruled on each category of shipping bills, dismissing some claims and remanding others for further review. Departmental appeals were allowed based on concessions and eligibility criteria. Overall, the case concluded with specific orders addressing the refund claims and legal interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 158 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349003</link>
      <description>The Tribunal disposed of the appeals related to refund claims by M/s.MMTC for exports during June 2008 to November 2008. The original authority and Commissioner (Appeals) had rejected the claims, leading to appeals by MMTC and Department. MMTC&#039;s advocate presented detailed arguments, including the acceptance of Indemnity Bonds for rejected claims. The Tribunal ruled on each category of shipping bills, dismissing some claims and remanding others for further review. Departmental appeals were allowed based on concessions and eligibility criteria. Overall, the case concluded with specific orders addressing the refund claims and legal interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>