https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348991 The appeal was allowed and the impugned adjudication order was set aside because the relied upon material and proof of service of notices were not traceable, leaving the matter incapable of effective examination on merits. The appellant had repeatedly sought the documents, but the investigation file was unavailable and the earlier stage hearing had not been properly completed. In these circumstances, continuation of the penalty order would have caused prejudice, and interference was warranted in the interests of justice. en-us Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:43:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348991 The appeal was allowed and the impugned adjudication order was set aside because the relied upon material and proof of service of notices were not traceable, leaving the matter incapable of effective examination on merits. The appellant had repeatedly sought the documents, but the investigation file was unavailable and the earlier stage hearing had not been properly completed. In these circumstances, continuation of the penalty order would have caused prejudice, and interference was warranted in the interests of justice. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348991