<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 137 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348982</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits to the appellant. The decision was primarily based on the invalidity of the show cause notice due to the improper invocation of the extended period of limitation. Consequently, the Tribunal did not record findings on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 137 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348982</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential benefits to the appellant. The decision was primarily based on the invalidity of the show cause notice due to the improper invocation of the extended period of limitation. Consequently, the Tribunal did not record findings on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>