<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 127 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348972</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled that loose stock in the Finishing Room is not considered finished goods for excise duty purposes under Notification 41/98-CE (N.T.). The Member (Judicial) determined that even goods in loose form awaiting only folding and packing are excisable goods, attracting duty. Previous tribunal judgments supported treating loose stock in the RG-1 register as finished goods. Despite the respondent&#039;s absence, the Appellant&#039;s Assistant Commissioner&#039;s submissions were considered, leading to the decision that the loose stock qualifies as finished goods for excise duty, affirming the liability to pay duty on the stock.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 127 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348972</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled that loose stock in the Finishing Room is not considered finished goods for excise duty purposes under Notification 41/98-CE (N.T.). The Member (Judicial) determined that even goods in loose form awaiting only folding and packing are excisable goods, attracting duty. Previous tribunal judgments supported treating loose stock in the RG-1 register as finished goods. Despite the respondent&#039;s absence, the Appellant&#039;s Assistant Commissioner&#039;s submissions were considered, leading to the decision that the loose stock qualifies as finished goods for excise duty, affirming the liability to pay duty on the stock.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>