<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 120 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348965</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand of interest against them was not sustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 120 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348965</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand of interest against them was not sustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>