<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 115 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the show cause notice dated 13.01.2006 was invalid as it invoked the same provisions as an earlier notice for the same period and subject matter. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and the Order-in-Original, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:34:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 115 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the show cause notice dated 13.01.2006 was invalid as it invoked the same provisions as an earlier notice for the same period and subject matter. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and the Order-in-Original, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>