<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1322 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194887</link>
    <description>Where a decree is carried in appeal and the appeal is disposed of on a preliminary ground, the appellate disposal may still mark the effective starting point for computing limitation for execution, and an execution petition filed within twelve years of that disposal is not time-barred. In execution against a closely held company, the corporate veil may be lifted where the company form is used to defeat enforcement or perpetrate fraud, permitting proceedings against the Managing Director&#039;s personal assets. On the facts, both the limitation objection and the challenge to execution against the Managing Director failed, and execution could continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:32:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=491388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1322 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194887</link>
      <description>Where a decree is carried in appeal and the appeal is disposed of on a preliminary ground, the appellate disposal may still mark the effective starting point for computing limitation for execution, and an execution petition filed within twelve years of that disposal is not time-barred. In execution against a closely held company, the corporate veil may be lifted where the company form is used to defeat enforcement or perpetrate fraud, permitting proceedings against the Managing Director&#039;s personal assets. On the facts, both the limitation objection and the challenge to execution against the Managing Director failed, and execution could continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>