https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194875 Section 9 interim relief under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is maintainable only where the dispute is referable to an arbitration agreement binding the concerned parties. Applying Section 7 and the approach approved in Sukanya Holdings, the court held that relief could not be invoked against respondents not covered by the arbitration agreement, and the Section 9 application was not maintainable. The court also clarified that observations made while rejecting Section 9 relief were confined to maintainability and did not bar the appellant from pursuing independent civil remedies in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Oct 2017 15:24:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194875 Section 9 interim relief under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is maintainable only where the dispute is referable to an arbitration agreement binding the concerned parties. Applying Section 7 and the approach approved in Sukanya Holdings, the court held that relief could not be invoked against respondents not covered by the arbitration agreement, and the Section 9 application was not maintainable. The court also clarified that observations made while rejecting Section 9 relief were confined to maintainability and did not bar the appellant from pursuing independent civil remedies in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194875