https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194873 A foreign judgment was treated as enforceable in India where it was conclusive under Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the objections based on lack of reciprocity, absence of oral hearing, natural justice, and fraud failed because the foreign courts had already considered and rejected them on the material before them. The Court held that the judgment was on merits and executable under Section 44-A where applicable. In aid of execution and limited Mareva relief, the Court upheld restraints on alienation of assets, including assets held through relatives or associated entities, and recognised that inherent powers may be used to prevent dissipation, preserve the subject matter, and lift the corporate veil where arrangements are alleged to defeat lawful claims. en-us Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194873 A foreign judgment was treated as enforceable in India where it was conclusive under Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the objections based on lack of reciprocity, absence of oral hearing, natural justice, and fraud failed because the foreign courts had already considered and rejected them on the material before them. The Court held that the judgment was on merits and executable under Section 44-A where applicable. In aid of execution and limited Mareva relief, the Court upheld restraints on alienation of assets, including assets held through relatives or associated entities, and recognised that inherent powers may be used to prevent dissipation, preserve the subject matter, and lift the corporate veil where arrangements are alleged to defeat lawful claims. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194873